The Pitt Has Entered Its West Wing Era

Returning triumphant, The Pitt confronts a problem reserved for a privileged few. After a debut season that exceeded even generous expectations, can the show do it all over again? As a format, television procedurals favor comfort and steady accretion, but The Pitt announced itself by pushing straight to the brink. Its first season’s defining set piece plunged the Pittsburgh Trauma Medical Center’s emergency department into the aftermath of a mass shooting, an act of narrative escalation that felt like the writers’ room emptying its reserves. How do you convert that level of intensity into durability?

The second season, set ten months later on a frenetic Fourth of July, responds by easing into itself and sticking to what it knows. Noah Wyle’s Dr. Michael “Robby” Robinavitch is back alongside his fellow attendings, charge nurses, interns, and med students, tending to barbecue mishaps, fingers blown off by firecrackers, and the emergency department’s usual day-to-day horrors. There are a handful of fresh faces in the form of newly arrived medical students, and one notable absence following Tracy Ifeachor’s departure from the show, but for the most part, the show delivers the same propulsive medical realism and rapid-fire interpersonal rhythms that made its debut so watchable. There’s also another major midseason development, which I won’t spoil, though crudely put, it registers as somewhat less severe than its predecessor.

Yet something has shifted. Fresh off an Emmys sweep, including a well-earned win for Wyle, who dedicated his award to anyone going on or coming off shift that night, The Pitt now feels high on its own medicine, its earnest confidence and moral clarity increasingly recalling that of The West Wing. That isn’t automatically a slight against the show — the Bartlet administration was a cozier, simpler time — but it isn’t automatically a virtue, either. There’s a fine line between righteousness and self-satisfaction, and the second season, which premieres on HBO Max on January 8, frequently stumbles into the latter territory.

The Pitt was always two shows running in parallel. One is a tactile medical procedural, committed to depicting the grinding reality of emergency medicine with such fidelity that real-life doctors finally felt they had something concrete (and entertaining!) to point to when explaining what exactly they do all day. The other is the aforementioned West Wing in scrubs: a fantasy about decent people doing noble work organized around a worldview that believes deeply in expertise, institutions, and the power of good intentions. This duality is no coincidence, as the show shares a creative steward in executive producer John Wells, who helped run both ER and The West Wing. Aaron Sorkin’s White House imagined governance by righteous underdogs outmaneuvering venal opponents through sheer moral clarity and superior wordplay, but it was also a weekly address on American life, using the presidency to sound off on issues like gun control, the death penalty, and the dignity of public service. The Pitt operates in a similar register. Its medical professionals aren’t just competent but morally perfect, their personal failings serving mainly to make their essential nobility more tangible. And because the emergency department cuts across class, race, and circumstance, and is shaped by policies made far from the hospital floor, the show has license to weigh in on issues ranging from the gutting of research funding and essential services to the lack of support for sexual-assault survivors.

The first season’s achievement was making these two impulses feel indivisible. By grafting old-school procedural pleasures onto a 24-esque real-time format, the show produced a genuinely novel structure in the post-prestige era that was impossible to look away from. Landing at Max also gave creator R. Scott Gemmill and his team latitude to push further into realism than broadcast standards would allow, and that gritty fidelity of blood, viscera, and frantic physicality of bodies being kept alive gave the show an awe-inspiring baseline moral authority. That verisimilitude functioned as a solvent, lending credibility and urgency to elements of the show that might otherwise register as pure cheese; the medical realism and sentimental flourishes were mutually reinforcing. Grit gave weight to feeling; feeling gave purpose to grit.

In the first season, that emotionality felt calibrated. In season two, based on the nine of 15 total episodes provided to critics, the restraint wavers and the balance begins to tilt. The competency porn remains superb, and the deep ensemble still supplies compelling conflicts: Shabana Azeez’s high-achieving but green medical student, Victoria Javadi, continues to wrestle with the optics of being a nepo baby; Patrick Ball’s Dr. Frank Langdon returns from suspension, eager to work his way toward redemption; Isa Briones’s Trinity Santos remains brashly self-assured. But the show’s engagement with this material now often feels perfunctory, more interested in displaying cleverness or swagger than in advancing character. And while The Pitt continues its advocacy, most notably in a well-executed arc delicately depicting the processing of a rape kit, there are moments in which its internal sense of authority, its desire to teach you something important, has grown louder and less restrained. Sure, Pittsburgh Trauma being a teaching hospital naturally lends to scenes of literal instruction, but too often the show pushes past procedural necessity into something distractingly pedantic, even patronizing.

This is most evident in the introductory arc involving Dr. Baran Al-Hashimi, a new character played by Sepideh Moafi. She’s briefly overlapping with Dr. Robby, preparing to take over as attending physician while he serves out his last day before a planned sabbatical to ride a motorcycle cross-country to Canada. Dr. Al-Hashimi is a technological optimist, convinced generative AI can aid in day-to-day medical work. Bright, chipper, and determined to solve the ER’s structural challenges, she and her optimism collide with Dr. Robby’s earthier, seen-it-all skepticism. What follows is fairly predictable: Generative AI’s well-documented limitations scramble sensitive patient data in ways Dr. Al-Hashimi should plausibly have anticipated, vindicating Dr. Robby for the moment. There’s some pleasure in watching this outcome — I am a writer at risk of displacement, after all — but the show’s thumb is plainly on the scale. Rather than probing the tension, let alone reflecting the reality that doctors are already integrating the technology into daily work, the arc plays like thesis confirmation as if you can feel the writers’ room announcing what it thinks about all this AI stuff and arranging the evidence accordingly. It underscores the shift in the show’s disposition: Where the first season felt genuinely searching, extending its ideas with the elegance of a team still working to win you over, the second has the arrogance of one that it believes it already has.

Such self-assurance brings nagging blind spots. The Pitt extends enormous empathy to its protagonists — it clearly views Dr. Robby as a flawed saint, Jesus Daddy — but its generosity toward patients is more uneven. In some instances, the show betrays a familiar upper-middle-class, blue-state gaze, depicting certain Americans as strangers to be managed, not people to be known. For example, a Georgian motor-racing family with a habit of pooling and sharing unprescribed medications is treated with faintly condescending humor as if the show finds them amusing rather than human in their structural desperation. Similarly, unhoused patients are either sources of spectacle (the first season’s man with rats nesting in his clothing) or figures whose primary function is to showcase the nurses’ compassion. These moments sit uneasily alongside patients the show treats with real feeling, like Louie, an older alcoholic who recurs through the first half of the season and is understood as a familiar presence in the ER. The point is not to question one portrayal over another but simply to note the inconsistency, how the show’s empathy sharpens or flattens depending on who, exactly, it decides is worth fully knowing.

This selective empathy undercuts the show’s handling of moral and professional stakes, a tendency that becomes more pronounced in season two but is visible as early as the first-season finale when Dr. Robby grows bitterly frustrated with the mother of an unvaccinated child with measles who resists his recommended treatment. The beat is recognizably real — emergency rooms across the country are overwhelmed, medical misinformation is rampant, and burnout is endemic — and his anger is perfectly justified: The dude is still working through one of the worst shifts of his life, having just treated mass-shooting survivors and watched his surrogate son’s girlfriend die. Yet the parents read as easy targets, there to underscore the crap that Robby and his colleagues must endure even on this darkest of days. There is a curious absence of any patience in exploring the forces shaping their unsettlingly growing worldview. Is it simply a case of too much misinformation? Were they, perhaps, let down by the medical establishment themselves? Whatever it may be, they are left behind, rendered as pure obstacle rather than people shaped by the same broader systemic failures the show means to interrogate. The Pitt knows exactly what it thinks and believes in, and it has no interest in complicating that picture.

It feels churlish to fault a show as sincere, politically engaged, and vocal in its advocacy for health-care workers as The Pitt, especially at a moment when public health infrastructure is under open attack. And on a meta level, it’s old-school television production that’s bringing consistent work back to Hollywood, whose day-to-day laborers are struggling with a declining industry. All of that is admirable, but none of it exempts the show from criticism. In retrospect, the first season’s novelty and breakneck momentum did much to sublimate its virtuous sensibility; but with a follow-up that plays more like a downshift, it moves to the foreground where its limitations become harder to ignore. What once read as moral conviction can, from another angle, start to look uncomfortably like a savior complex.

There’s Something Big Beneath The Boroughs

Off-Campus Has a First-Pancake Problem

Nemesis Brings the Heat